Recordings/Discussions
Background Information
Performer Bios

Poet/Composer Bios

Additional Information


ca. 1733 ca. 1741 1746 1747 1748 1750

The Portrait in Erfurt Alleged to Depict Bach, the Weimar Concertmeister - Is this young man really Johann Sebastian Bach? Pages
at
The Face Of Bach

Page 4


The Face Of Bach


This remarkable photograph is not a computer generated composite; the original of the Weydenhammer Portrait Fragment, all that remains of the portrait of Johann Sebastian Bach that belonged to his pupil Johann Christian Kittel, is resting gently on the surface of the original of the 1748 Elias Gottlob Haussmann Portrait of Johann Sebastian Bach.

1092-18A-0635.jpg  Loading 64973 bytes
1748 Elias Gottlob Haussmann Portrait, Courtesy of William H. Scheide, Princeton, New Jersey
Weydenhammer Portrait Fragment, ca. 1733, Artist Unknown, Courtesy of the Weydenhammer Descendants
Photograph by Teri Noel Towe
©Teri Noel Towe, 2001, All Rights Reserved


The Portrait in Erfurt Alleged to Depict Bach, the Weimar Concertmeister

14beyerjsb550.jpg Loading 108350 bytes 14rentschjsb550.jpg  Loading 84328 bytes
Before the 1907 Restoration and As It Looked in 1985

Is this young man really Johann Sebastian Bach?
Page 4


Next, I turned to Prof. Dr. Overmann's short article announcing the existence of the painting:

0765-DMvii335-h6-EBB01.jpg  Loading 130243 bytes

0765-DMvii336-h6-EBB02.jpg  Loading 144661 bytes

0765-DMvii36-h6-EBB03.jpg  Loading 115 722bytes

Besseler clearly took his statement of the provenance directly from Prof. Dr. Overmann's account, but like his source, Besseler begs an important question. If the painting had an inscription on the back in a Rococo hand identifying the subject as Johann Sebastian Bach, and giving the date and the town of birth as well, why was that inscription not preserved or, at the very least, photographed or traced? That the physical evidence of the painting's provenance was not preserved is suspect, particularly since no explanation of why it was not preserved is offered.

Throughout the brief article, Prof. Dr. Overmann is careful, however, in presenting the best case that he can for the authenticity of the painting. Among other things, he cautiously discusses the possibility that the Erfurt Portrait is the lost Kittel portrait. Even if it were an accurate depiction of the facial features of Johann Sebastian Bach, the Erfurt Portrait could not be the portrait of Bach that belonged to Kittel. Why is explained in detail in the Queens College Lecture, but suffice it to say that the Erfurt Portrait fails a most important test, as Dr. Overmann acknowledges near the end of his article: It does not match the one description that we have of the lost Kittel portrait. In his 1850 monograph on Bach, Carl Ludwig Hilgenfeldt catalogues the various portraits of Bach of which he had knowledge. In describing the portrait that belonged to Kittel, Hilgenfeldt wrote: "... ein Brustbild, Bach im Staatskleide darstellend". Hilgenfeldt's description of the appearance of the painting that belonged to Kittel, is, to the best of my knowledge, unique. The specific statement that the portrait is a bust portrait and, more importantly, that it depicts Bach in official regalia of one kind or another sets the portrait that belonged to Kittel apart from every other known authentic image.

Not only is the young man who is depicted in the Erfurt "Brustbild" not Bach, but also he is not "Bach im Staatskleide darstellend".

Please click on 0100xABB1link.jpg  Loading 38977 bytes to go on to Page 5.


Please click on 1092-18A-0100v.jpg  Loading 35034 bytes to return to the Index Page at The Face Of Bach.

Please click on abdyjsb2.jpg to visit the Johann Sebastian Bach Index Page at Teri Noel Towe's Homepages.

Please click on the crabby2.jpg to visit the Teri Noel Towe Welcome Page.


TheFaceOfBach@aol.com


Copyright, Teri Noel Towe, 2000 , 2002
Unless otherwise credited, all images of the Weydenhammer Portrait:  Copyright, The Weydenhammer Descendants, 2000
All Rights Reserved

The Face Of Bach
Remains Profoundly Grateful to
The Rainbow Flag Civic Center

For Providing the Cyberspace for The Face Of Bach
For the First Eight Years of Its Existence.
Thank you, Nathan P. Johansen!
The Face Of Bach
Now Is Profoundly Grateful to
The Bach Cantatas Website

For Providing The Face Of Bach
With a New Home.
Thank you, Aryeh Oron!


The Face Of Bach is a PPP Free Early Music website.
192mammuthusimp.jpg  Loading 50906 bytes
The Face Of Bach
has received the HIP Woolly Mammoth Stamp of Approval from
The HIP-ocrisy Home Page.



ca. 1733 ca. 1741 1746 1747 1748 1750



 

Back to the Top


Last update: Sunday, July 02, 2017 03:52